RE: Proposal to add foaf:Agent to "Allowable Types" for earl:TestSubject

 
Hi,

> Currently we have earl:WebContent and earl:Software (which 
> may be replaced by dctype:Software) as "Allowable Types" for 
> earl:TestSubject. How about expanding these types by 
> foaf:Agent to allow a whole variety of things to be test subjects?
> 
> Please indicate your opinion on this proposal to the list.

"The foaf:Agent class is the class of agents; things that do stuff."
[http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/#term_Agent]

So, I don't find it proper to use it as TestSubject (they do nothing).
As I said before, I think that this class fits better as an "Allowable
Type" for earl:Assertor.

Regards,

CI.