- From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 13:23:55 +0200
- To: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Hi again, > Johannes Koch wrote: > >> They may be used as values for Resource Type, > > > > It's intended to be used as value for Resource Type. > > Which I think is fine with us, right? As far as I understood Johannes' concerns (please correct me if I'm wrong), the problem is he think they were intended to be used just as dc:type (Resource Type) allowable values. So it should be used always as in the following example: <earl:Software rdf:about="#tool"> <dc:title xml:lang="en">Cool Tool</dc:title> <dc:date rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#gDate">2005-06-25</dc:date> **<dc:type rdf:resource="http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Software"/>** </earl:Software> So, IMO the question is: could be the use of a term from the DC Type Vocabulary for something different from dc:type considered as a "bad practice"? > > And it has not properties we would be interested in, like name, > > version, etc. Is this a problem? > > Is it valid to use title, hasVersion, etc within this class? I suppose so, isn't it? Regards, CI. -------------------------------------- Carlos Iglesias CTIC Foundation Science and Technology Park of Gijón 33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain phone: +34 984291212 fax: +34 984390612 email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Wednesday, 5 July 2006 11:24:12 UTC