- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2006 20:50:04 +0100
- To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, public-wai-ert@w3.org
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:02:18 +0100, Johannes Koch
<johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>
> Johannes Koch wrote:
>
>> * http-20051123.rdfs: RDF schema for HTTP
>
>> <rdf:Property rdf:about="&http-ns;header">
>> <rdfs:label xml:lang="en">Header</rdfs:label>
>> <rdfs:comment>An HTTP header</rdfs:comment>
>> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="&http-ns;Request"/>
>
> The rdfs:domain must be deleted.
Or develop a superclass, that can be the domain.
Anyway, I think that we should propose all this stuff as a working group
note. With a published schema for the namespace and a few examples, we can
then say that we expect the range of our httpXXX properties to be things
in the Schema.
We should also run it by the SemWeb Best practices group...
cheers
Chaals
--
Charles McCathieNevile chaals@opera.com
hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
Peek into the kitchen: http://snapshot.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 19:50:15 UTC