W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

Re: HTTP Vocabulary in RDF

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 22:59:25 +0100
Message-ID: <45870F3D.6070605@w3.org>
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 22:13 +0100, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>>> - We store XML in the message body when we deal with SOAP messages, but
>>> that doesn't seem to be allowed by http:body.
>> Indeed it is but the XML Literal needs to be converted to base64 first. 
>> It will also need to be translated back in order to be human readable...
> 
> That's a pity to require base64 since it makes it unusable for XSLT
> processors.

It is generally very difficult to process RDF (in the RDF/XML 
serialization) with XSLT anyway. We needed an encoding that could 
capture any http:body content such as images, sound, etc.

Anyway, we'll discuss this again. Thanks for your comments.


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 21:59:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT