W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

RE: more discussion on warnings in EARL

From: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:35:44 +0100
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA5218828190199C01E@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Hi Johannes,

> No, according to the clarification
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/2006
> OctDec/0019.html>
> of my comment, the warnings are only informative, and not 
> test outcomes. 
> So if there is no FAIL, the outcome is PASS.

I think this is for the overall test (the set of several atomic tests), but what's the outcome for those wich are atomic?

The same example again:

If the document's Internet media type is "text/html". Outcome for this atomic test?



Carlos Iglesias

CTIC Foundation
Science and Technology Park of Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, Spain 

phone: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 10:35:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC