- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:08:49 +0100
- To: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Carlos Iglesias schrieb: > I don't know exactly what, but I think something is missing. > > Let's say we have: > > <earl:Assertion rdf:ID="#assertion"> > <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#assertor" /> > <earl:subject rdf:resource="#subject" /> > <earl:test rdf:resource="#testcase" /> > <earl:result rdf:resource="#result" /> > </earl:Assertion> > > For example in the case of an assertion about a content with transparent > content negotation, what WebContent should you use as Subject of the > Assertion? > > Wc1? Wc2? A RDF container with both? Probably you performed the evaluation on wc2 because it contain actual content. So the subject would be wc2. If OTOH you did an evaluation on wc1, the subject would be wc1. -- Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE) Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 17:09:29 UTC