W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [ACTION] represenation of simple and more complicated HTTP conversation in RDF

From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:08:49 +0100
Message-ID: <457EE221.4040006@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: ERT group <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Carlos Iglesias schrieb:
> I don't know exactly what, but I think something is missing.
> 
> Let's say we have:
> 
> <earl:Assertion rdf:ID="#assertion">
>   <earl:assertedBy rdf:resource="#assertor" />
>   <earl:subject rdf:resource="#subject" />
>   <earl:test rdf:resource="#testcase" />
>   <earl:result rdf:resource="#result" />
> </earl:Assertion>
> 
> For example in the case of an assertion about a content with transparent
> content negotation, what WebContent should you use as Subject of the
> Assertion?
> 
> Wc1? Wc2? A RDF container with both?

Probably you performed the evaluation on wc2 because it contain actual 
content. So the subject would be wc2. If OTOH you did an evaluation on 
wc1, the subject would be wc1.

-- 
Johannes Koch - Competence Center BIKA
Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT.LIFE)
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Tuesday, 12 December 2006 17:09:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:27 GMT