W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > December 2006

Re: [ACTION] Warnings in EARL

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2006 21:03:45 +0100
Message-ID: <45747F21.8040501@w3.org>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi Carlos,

Carlos Iglesias wrote:
> In response to the action item recorded at [...] the following is a
> proposal to include warnings management in EARL.

Thank you for working on this, and for sharing your ideas!

> - Does this proposal cover everybody's needs? 

I think purists would argue that these are actually three separate 
testable criteria hiding in one shell:

* CSS document validity
* background/foreground color contrast
* redefinition of properties

> - Is there any use case where a warning messages could be treated 
> as anything else than "plain text"? 

It seems we still need a compelling example of a real warning in the 
context of EARL. We often talked about warning to describe situations 
such as "nearly-passed" or "could-do-better". I can't think an example 
but we need one to justify this new feature.

> - Are any additional properties necessary? (e.g a warning id)

Inspired by your example, I was thinking of an earl:relatesTo property 
which points to another related test result. However, I think that would 
be an attempt to define a test description language...


Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Monday, 4 December 2006 20:03:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC