W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > April 2006

Re: [AI] comments to byteOffset

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:49:16 +0100
Message-ID: <015101c66948$f9ebf4b0$2402a8c0@Snufkin>
To: "Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>, <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

"Johannes Koch" <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
>>  <earl:snippet>
>>    <earl:Snippet>
>>     <earl:byteContent>214328764328764387ae343eeee7e7ee</earl:byteContent>
>>     <earl:byteOffset>15</earl:byteOffset>
>>    </earl:Snippet>
>>   </earl:snippet>
>>
>> Is that ok JK?
>
> You need to record the byte->character encoding scheme (e.g. Base64) 
> somewhere.

I was thinking of defining byteContent to be base64 encoded, do you think 
that would not be a good idea?

Jim. 
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 15:49:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT