W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > April 2006

Re: URI-in-RDF vs. single URI property

From: Carlos A Velasco <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:21:00 +0200
Message-ID: <444F498C.2020207@fit.fraunhofer.de>
To: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

OK, I admit it: I did not check the URL for more than a year :-))


Johannes Koch wrote:
> Carlos A Velasco wrote:
>> I can live with both solutions (I like a little bit more the 
>> URI-in-RDF way), but if we follow the single property solution, I 
>> would put it anyway in its own namespace (RFC2396),
> AFAIK, the current URI RFC is 3986 :-)

Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/
Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT
   [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)]
   Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle
   Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany)
   Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 10:22:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:54 UTC