W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2005

Re: First Working Draft of EARL 1.0 Requirements

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:21:02 +0200
Message-ID: <429C64BE.3080803@w3.org>
To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi Charles,

Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2005/03/issues.html>
>>  - Modify schema to accommodate types of subjects (products)
>>     * CMN: chase karl and come up with a proposal
> 
> 
> There was a proposal in the schema modifications proposal, and a  
> disccussion after that, and I am happy about the results. I don't plan 
> to  continue this action item

OK agreed.


>>  - Conversion between current and newer EARL versions
>>     * CMN: look into implementation for this functionality
>>

You missed out responding to this one. This is not top priority now but we may need this further down the road. Let me know if you plan to continue this action item (maybe at a later point in time).


>> <http://www.w3.org/2005/05/03-er-minutes>
>>  * cmn to look up how to define ID as required
> 
> 
> I though I had done this. We have to make some special magic, or 
> implement  it outside RDF.

Seems I missed your message to the list on this one, could you please send me the link again? It would be helpful if you could clarify what the "special magic" is so that we can estimate the effort/benefit factor. We should really try to stay within RDF.


>> <http://www.w3.org/2005/05/24-er-minutes>
>>  * chaals dig out how to require some non-earl property in the earl  
>> spec, using OWL
> 
> 
> Same way you require an earl property using OWL. e.g. owl:Restriction,  
> owl:someValuesFrom, ...

Can you please be more specific on this? We would need real code examples that I can put into the changes proposal straight away so that we can see how it really looks like.


> I plan to look at this when doing a new spec draft - i.e. at the point  
> where we get to discussing what restrictions we might want.

No, please don't wait with this one. We already need to use external vocabulary (such as dc:date or dc:title) as properties of EARL classes. We need to conclude pretty soon how we want to do this.

Thanks for the update on your action items.

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2005 13:21:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT