W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Conformance to EARL

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:27:36 +0200
Message-ID: <42949968.3060007@w3.org>
To: "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>


Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
> Sure. The proposed requirement was that they create their own namespace  
> for it, and not make up some property and put it in the EARL namespace.  

OK, got it. We were talking about the same thing all along, I might have not precised that in my initial message. However, this comes nearly for free when we specify a solid schema. Any vocabulary that claims to be in EARL (by using the namespace) but actually isn't can be easily identified.

One issue down, 99.999 more to go ;)


Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 15:27:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:52 UTC