W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Confidence claims in EARL assertions

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:47:30 +0200
Message-ID: <429481F2.2000109@w3.org>
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Nils Ulltveit-Moe wrote:
>> - Support Probability Value
>>Much of the previous discussion seems to be supportive of adding a mechanism to express probability 
>>values (aka intervals etc) when they exist. This is only applicable to some tests.
> 
> 
> To me it seems that probability is involved to a quite large extent,
> however there are cases where a barrier is absolute, and the disabled
> user is not able to fulfill his task on the website due to this
> accessibility problem. 

Remember, we are looking at the probability that a result is indeed precise, not the impact or effect of that result in any further context. For the specific case of Web accessibility, the relative priority level of the checkpoint (or success criteria) indicates that impact for people with disabilities. This is different from the earl:confidence value we are talking about here.


Cheers,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2005 13:47:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT