W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > March 2005

Re: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL Requirements)

From: Myriam Arrue <myriam@si.ehu.es>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:31:55 +0100
Message-ID: <010d01c523f3$f59624d0$c171e39e@sipi93>
To: "Carlos Iglesias" <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>, <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>

Hello,
I also agree with Shadi. 
Talk to you later,
Myriam

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlos Iglesias" <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
To: <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL Requirements)


> 
> 
> Completely agree.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Carlos Iglesias.
> 
> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: public-wai-ert-request@w3.org 
> > [mailto:public-wai-ert-request@w3.org] En nombre de Shadi Abou-Zahra
> > Enviado el: martes, 08 de marzo de 2005 11:13> 
> 
> > Here I am referring to the "EARL Primer" rather than the 
> > "EARL Technical Specification". I think there are some 
> > developers who only want to output EARL and quite frankly 
> > hardly care if it is RDF/XML or a comma delimited file; they 
> > just want to know the strings they need to generate. Then 
> > there are others who want to read EARL reports and process 
> > them in some form; I think they may want to know more details 
> > such as subclassing entities and so on. Our examples should 
> > reflect these use cases (for the specification) and talk to 
> > these developers. Do you agree with that?
> >
> > Regards,
> >   Shadi
> >
>  
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:23:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT