Well, I am not sure about Karl, but this makes good sense to me :-) cheers Chaals On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 05:12:54 -0500, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote: > Here I am referring to the "EARL Primer" rather than the "EARL Technical > Specification". I think there are some developers who only want to > output EARL and quite frankly hardly care if it is RDF/XML or a comma > delimited file; they just want to know the strings they need to > generate. Then there are others who want to read EARL reports and > process them in some form; I think they may want to know more details > such as subclassing entities and so on. Our examples should reflect > these use cases (for the specification) and talk to these developers. Do > you agree with that? -- Charles McCathieNevile Fundacion Sidar charles@sdar.org +61 409 134 136 http://www.sidar.orgReceived on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 15:02:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT