W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Does TestCase belong in EARL

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:55:13 +0200
To: shadi@w3.org, "public-wai-ert@w3.org" <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.sson0tj7wxe0ny@widsith.local>

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005 17:40:42 +0200, Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:

> TestCase is only a URI pointing to some external test case. Ideally,  
> that is described in a standardized test case description format. Do we  
> need to have that Class inside EARL or is the property from the  
> Assertion sufficient?

Well, ideally there would be somthing else that we could use. But it is  
usful to have the class, because you can do some important basic  
description of the test case - give it a title, describe how to find out  
about it and who created it, use OWL to discuss versioning it...

For these reasons I think it is worth keeping unless we run across a more  
developed RDF class that handles the same things

Cheers

Chaals

-- 
Charles McCathieNevile                              chaals@opera.com
          hablo español - je parle français - jeg lærer norsk
   Here's one we prepared earlier:   http://www.opera.com/download
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 19:55:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:26 GMT