- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 10:14:20 +0200
- To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi Jim, Jim Ley wrote: > "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org> > >> Would this mean the date on the Web content would become obsolete >> or at least optional? I doubt there are many cases when the content is >> captured then tested at a (significantly) different time. What do >> people think? > > I think optional, and we should lean towards not the date it was > captured but the last-modified date of the web-content? or should we > just include that as a last-modified property of it? Wouldn't the last-modified information already be in the http-header? We still need to refine the http-header stuff but I think this approach makes sense: a date is provided by the tools for when the test was executed and a last-modified from the Web server to reference the content that the tool is talking about. Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe Chair and Team Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ WAI-TIES Project, http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools WG, http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles -- 06560, Sophia-Antipolis -- France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Friday, 17 June 2005 08:14:22 UTC