- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 11:27:42 +0200
- To: Charles McCN <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Hi, Charles McCN wrote: > I think that the requirement for machine processing in reasonable time > should be a should, since "reasonable time" is not exactly well specified. Good point. However, I believe there is agreement that the "machine processable" part is a *must*. I'll flag that as an issue we still need to work on. > I also think the "Status of this Document" section should say something > about what the future of the document is expected to be (update > schedule, what it is meant to end up as). The W3C Process document and the ERT WG Charter address that already. > Neither of these strike me as a good reason to hold back publication of > a draft, so I am happy to sign off on this as is, or with either or > both of the above amendments, given that we can edit it still. Thanks for your input! Regards, Shadi -- Shadi Abou-Zahra, Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), http://www.w3.org/ Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES) http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64 Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22
Received on Tuesday, 7 June 2005 09:27:43 UTC