W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > June 2005

Re: Confidence Claims - more discussion

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:10:50 +0200
Message-ID: <429F136A.20705@w3.org>
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Cc: public-wai-ert@w3.org

Hi,

Nick Kew wrote:
>>I don't think it's necessary to state that the first image has an alt
>>attribute and the second image has an alt attribute and the third image
>>etc. You just need to state that all images have an alt attribute.
> 
> 
> Well, yes.  But in effect, that's just a detailed statement of the
> tool's capabilities.  This tool tests ALT attributes for every IMG;
> therefore every IMG that isn't reported has passed that test.
> It's no more than a static document.

How do you know that "this tool tests ALT attributes for every IMG"? Do you really *trust* that a tool carried out a test, and that test passes just because it doesn't include it in the report?

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra,       Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),             http://www.w3.org/ 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),      http://www.w3.org/WAI/ 
IST WAI-TIES Project (WAI-TIES)     http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ 
Evaluation and Repair Tools (ERT WG), http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ 
2004, Route des Lucioles BP93 - 06560 Sophia-Antipolis - France 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64             Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 14:11:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:25 GMT