W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert@w3.org > February 2005

FW: [Moderator Action] Re: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL Requirements)

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:40:00 +0100
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003d01c51a8f$7bc1ef80$4502010a@K2>

[This mail from Myriam was bounced back for some reason, resending to
list]

-----Original Message-----
From: Myriam Arrue [mailto:myriam@si.ehu.es] 
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 17:13
To: public-wai-ert@w3.org
Subject: [Moderator Action] Re: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL
Requirements)




Hello !!
There are some target audiences defined in the current EARL document
user
scenarios. One of them is a web accessibility consultant who uses
different
evaluation tools and after comparing the results obtained from these
tools,
elaborates a complete accessibility report for the client.
One use case that we have thought about is the use of EARL by a tool to
gather results from different evaluations tools and elaborate a complete
accessibility report. So this use case is the automatic version of the
one
currently defined in the document.
This automatic version has as its target audience "a tool developer who
wants to make use of EARL results" as Shadi has said.
But perhaps, it is useful to keep the manual version too since an
accessibility consultant might want to get different EARL reports
interpret,
compare them and elaborate a complete report.
I think this user only needs to understand and interpret the different
data
contained in the EARL result.
What do you think about it?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Shadi Abou-Zahra" <shadi@w3.org>
To: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:38 PM
Subject: Audience (was Brainstorm of EARL Requirements)


>
> Hi,
>
> The previous comments from Gabriele reminded me that we need to do
some
> more analysis of the target audience. It seems that we need to address
> at least two types of EARL users (can anyone think of more?):
>
> * evaluation tool developer who only wants to output EARL
>  - does not need too much background in RDF, OWL, etc
>
> * (any) tool developer who wants to make use of EARL results
>  - needs to know how to work with RDF in order to interpret results
>
> Of each of these two user groups, there may be two further categories
of
> developers which we should consider:
>
> * developers who are new to EARL and need more explanation /
background
>
> * developers who already implement EARL and want to reference the spec
>
>
> Does this sufficiently cover the target audience for EARL?
>
> Regards,
>   Shadi
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 16:39:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:55:52 UTC