- From: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:55:48 -0400
- To: <shadi@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-wai-ert@w3.org>
> Also, see the earl:location proposal from Johannes > which seems to me more compact and robust than > your earl:testing. > Johannes proposed: <earl:line>3</earl:line> <earl:column>19</earl:column> <earl:xpath>/html[1]/body[1]/p[1]/map[1]/area[2]</earl:xpath> <earl:near rdf:parseType="Literal"><![CDATA[<area href="foo.jpg" alt="foo">]]></earl:near> Johannes also proposed putting the whole thing inside: <earl:location> <rdf:Seq> Charles proposed: <testing:xpath>/html/body/p/img</testing:xpath> <testing:line rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#Integer">9</testing:line> <testing:src>rex.jpg</testing:src> Have I got that right? Is there a benefit to one proposal over the other? Chris
Received on Wednesday, 6 April 2005 13:55:53 UTC