W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [reminder] review and approval of the Web interface

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:24:49 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20090623140910.02556e60@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: TSD TF <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>
Hi,

At 13:22 18/05/2009, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>Dear group,
>
>Ref: <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/WebInterface/>
>
>The logs aren't showing any active testing of the Web interface, I 
>was hoping that people would be reviewing it as discussed. In order 
>to get started and resume our work, please indicate to the list:
>  - your approval of the Web interface as-is (*)
>  - principal approval but with change requests
>  - urgent change requests before tool launching
>
>(*) Note that the "view test sample" function is currently only 
>static mockup and will be finalized soon. Please don't send comments 
>on this function or page (yet).

Below are a few comments:

* When a structure review has been done and concluded with a "fail" 
result, the "action" column in the overview will say "reopen review". 
Activating this link creates an empty structure review form. I could 
not find a way to look at the review results, because the "Structure 
Reviews" column is empty. Is this intentional? (Tested with test sample 2)
* Similarly, when a structure review concluded with a "pass", the 
"action" column will say "content review", with no possibility to 
view the structure review because the "Structure review" column is 
empty. This is not always important, but I was just curious if it was 
possible to view the results of the structure review (e.g. for 
content in the textarea at the end). (Tested with test sample 9)
* Similary, when a structure review concluded with a "can't tell", 
the "action" column will say "structure review", and activating that 
link generates an empty form, without a mechanism to view the 
previous structure review, because the "Structure review" column is 
empty. For "can't tell" results, preserving the data of a previous 
review may be more important that for the previous two cases. (Tested 
with test sample 10)

The above three issues are strange because this used to work (see the 
columns for "Structure review" that were done in April/early May.

Best regards,

Christophe



>Regards,
>   Shadi
>
>--
>Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
>   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
>  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
"Better products and services through end-user empowerment" 
http://www.usem-net.eu/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, Quechup or other 
"social networks". You may have agreed to their "privacy policy", but 
I haven't.
Received on Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:25:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 June 2009 12:25:36 GMT