W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > July 2008

RE: Test Samples for TSD TF decision [batch #1 for 15 July 2008]

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 17:57:13 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20080714175422.03f663d0@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi Tim,

At 16:49 14/07/2008, Tim Boland wrote:

>I'm not sure what it precisely means to "accept" 
>the test sample - does that mean that we
>agree with the review results or trust the 
>reviewer?  In 
>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process, Step 4 
>Description prose has "decision" used in two 
>different contexts?  What is the exact "decision" that we're making in this
>voting?

The voting itself is not a task force decision 
but provides input to the discussion (during the 
teleconference) that leads to the task force 
decision, much like the straw polls in the WCAG 
working group are input for dicussion in the teleconferences.
Does this help?

Best regards,

Christophe


>Thanks and best wishes
>Tim Boland NIST
>
>   At 04:13 PM 7/14/2008 +0200, you wrote:
>
>>Hi Shadi and everybody else,
>>
>>
>> > Below is a batch of Test Samples that have been reviewed and are ready
>> > for a TSD TF decision. For each Test Sample you should indicate one of
>> > the following:
>> >
>> > 1. "Accept as-is" - to accept the review results as they are
>> > 2. "Accept with changes" - to accept the review with changes
>> > 3. "Abstain" - to abstain from a vote (for whatever reason)
>> > 4. "Propose changes" - suggest changes to the review results
>> >
>> > Please provide a rationale where appropriate (especially for #2 and #4).
>> >
>> > Note: you do not need to go through the full review but just verify that
>> > you agree with the review results, especially with any recommendations
>> > or comments that the reviewers make.
>> >
>> >
>> > BATCH #1:
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_001>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_002>
>>
>>Not sure, they are plenty of "not sure" and 
>>open questions. Hard to know what are you supposed to agree with.
>>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_016>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_018>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_019>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_026>
>>
>>Of course I agree with myself so I suppose that 
>>"Accept as-is", but probably it should be an Abstain, no?
>>
>>Now seriously, should I vote on my own reviews?
>>
>>(note that there are also several "can not 
>>tell" assertions in my reviews, so it may also 
>>be hard for others to express an opinion on them)
>>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_030>
>>
>>Accept as-is
>>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_036>
>>
>>Accept as-is
>>
>> > 
>> <http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList/ContentReview_content-> 
>> structure-separation-programmatic_037>
>>
>>Accept as-is
>>
>>
>>
>>Regards,
>>  CI.
>>
>>____________________
>>
>>Carlos Iglesias
>>
>>Fundación CTIC
>>Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
>>33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España
>>teléfono: +34 984291212
>>email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
>>URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org
>

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
---
Please don't invite me to LinkedIn, Facebook, 
Quechup or other "social networks". You may have 
agreed to their "privacy policy", but I haven't.


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 14 July 2008 15:57:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 14 July 2008 15:57:57 GMT