W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > January 2007

Re: sc2.5.1_l1_002 step 3: Content Review

From: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:00:19 +0100
Message-ID: <1167746419.459a6573ec130@webmail2.kuleuven.be>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi Shadi,

Quoting Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>:
> Carlos Iglesias wrote:
> > * the test sample and the test procedure are an unambiuous unit; ??
> > I suppose so :o)
> 
> Does the test sample interpret or change the meaning of the 
> test procedure? Tim already identified this imprecise wording 
> and I have an action item to refine it.

I'm not sure I understand how a test sample can interpret or change the 
meaning of the test procedure. But more importantly, if a sample 
appears to do that, it is not appriopriate for the technique or failure.
(Interpreting or changing the meaning of the test procedure or any 
other part of the technique or failure was a concern that was also 
raised with regard to e.g. "expertGuidance", but out metadata document 
says: "it shall not be used to interpret WCAG 2.0 Techniques".)

Best regards,

Christophe

-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 14:00:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT