W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > February 2007

Fwd: Re: Wiki: proposals for templates and index page available for review

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:44:34 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20070212094354.01f5eb20@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Forwarded message (in case I didn't send it earlier)


>To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org
>From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
>Subject: Re: Wiki: proposals for templates and index page available 
>for   review
>
>Thanks for all your good work.   I have the following initial comments:
>
>If a test sample can undergo several structure reviews, does this mean 
>that one person will do multiple reviews at different times (maybe implied 
>since there is a "Reviewer" assigned), or different people will do 
>different reviews?  If the latter, how do  we know who does which review?
>
>For structure review, should there be a column for additional 
>comments?  Also should there be definitions of "committed",
>"available", "valid", etc. for a reviewer to consult?   Should there be a 
>link to "the naming conventions", "the correct format", and "the correct 
>syntax" for the reviewer to consult?   Why is the "unintentional" in there 
>for "broken links"?  What exactly are "other values" and "other texts" 
>(maybe some examples)?  What does it mean for locations to be "referenced 
>correctly" and to be "consistent with each other"?
>
>If defects are found in the structure review, how are those corrected?  Is 
>the submitter notified?
>
>That's it so far.. will move on to "content review"..
>
>Thanks and best wishes
>Tim Boland NIST
>
>At 03:55 PM 2/6/2007 +0100, you wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Vangelis and I had action items to create proposals for the review 
>>information (and other metadata not stored in TCDL) and an index page.
>>There are two approaches available for review:
>>* Vangelis created one template for the structure review [1], and one for 
>>the content review [2];
>>* I have also created a template for a page that would combine info from 
>>structure and content reviews with info on the contributor or source of 
>>the test sample, task force straw poll comments (if we decide to work 
>>with straw polls) and WCAG WG decisions/comments [3]. There would be one 
>>such page per test sample (the ID of the test sample would match the 
>>title of the page), which would enable us to see at a glance what has 
>>been done for a specific test sample.
>>
>>I have also created a proposal for an index page [4]. This currently 
>>contains an empty table with columns for test sample ID (with link to web 
>>version of the TCDL metadata), a link to the test sample's wiki page (see 
>>above), the name of the reviewer to whom the test sample is assigned, and 
>>it's status. (It would be even nicer if such a table could be generated 
>>automatically from our other data ...)
>>
>>Links to these proposals can be found on the front page of our Wiki at 
>>http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/FrontPage.
>>
>>Please send comments to the list by next Monday.
>>
>>Best regards,
>>
>>Christophe
>>
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStructureReviewTemplate
>>[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleContentReviewTemplate
>>[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleOverviewTemplate
>>[4] http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList
>>
>>
>>--
>>Christophe Strobbe
>>K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
>>Document Architectures
>>Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
>>tel: +32 16 32 85 51
>>http://www.docarch.be/
>>
>>Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 14:45:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT