W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: [draft #2] updated review process workflow

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 21:29:31 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070427212340.02ef4690@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: <public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org>

Hi Reinhard, All,

At 14:41 25/04/2007, Reinhard Ruemer wrote:
> >>> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 04/24/07 3:31 pm >>>
>
> >Question:
> >-  It is unclear if the "moderate improvements" are to be made by the
>
> >author of the test sample or by the Task Force participants. Also a
> >combination of these approaches may be possible. We need to decide and
>
> >document how this step is handled.
>
>If we assign it to Task Force participants, we have somehow to find a
>system how we assign the work clearly to the participants.

This needn't be a difficulty: we could either assign it to the
last/current reviewer, or let the task force facilitators assign
it to somebody else.


>To me it makes more sense to make clear comments on the scenario and
>let the author do the improvements.

Waiting for the author to make changes could cause delays. On a
practical level: if the author is not a task force member (i.e.
no CVS access), we need to send back the files, including the TCDL.
Submitters of test samples do not necessarily create the TCDL, because
it is ideally created from the form data when they submit the sample.
We can't expect them to learn TCDL just to edit a sample.

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group 
on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Friday, 27 April 2007 19:29:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT