W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > April 2007

Re: Reviewing SpecName

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 20:59:16 +0200
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20070404205453.0294c2d0@esat.kuleuven.be>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi Shadi,

At 20:08 3/04/2007, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>After re-reading the checklist for content review, I wonder if we 
>should say something about the usage of SpecName in the metadata. 
>The SpecName technologies in there should really match the intention 
>(or references) of the respective WCAG 2.0 Technique.
>
>Any objections? Any wording suggestions?

I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at.
Is this related to the applicability section in the WCAG 2.0 
techniques and failures? I.e. do you mean that the content review 
should check that technologies in the test sample (or at least the 
technology in which the technique or failure can be highlighted) is 
also in the applicability section? (Or rather the other way around?)

Best regards,

Christophe


-- 
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group 
on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/ 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 18:59:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT