W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > October 2006

Re: Minimum number of techniques in metadata

From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 11:03:04 -0500
Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20061030105122.03348ef0@mailserver.nist.gov>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

I think we need to allow for the possibility that successful accomplishment 
of multiple techniques may be a way of meeting a particular SC.   Also, 
isn't it true that the techniques are non-normative (not "required" - re: 
abstract in [1]), whereas the SC are normative, so if true I just want to 
make sure that this distinction is preserved in the usage document.

Thanks and best wishes
Tim Boland NIST

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/

At 05:45 PM 10/30/2006 +0200, you wrote:

>Hi Christophe, all,
>
>I am sure there will be more ... so I think we need to go for it.
>
>Additionally, I am not sure if for every failure of a technique there 
>is  a "failure" in the techniques document (??)..
>
>regards,
>Vangelis
>
>cstrobbe wrote:
>>Hi,
>>Currently, the usage document [1] states: "Each each [sic] WCAG 2.0 Test 
>>Sample must be linked to exactly one WCAG 2.0 technique or failure."
>>However, some success criteria require a combination of techniques, for 
>>example SC 2.4.2: "More than one way is available to locate content 
>>within a set of Web units..." [2]. Should we loosen up the restriction 
>>about the number of techniques? We
>>could do that: "Each WCAG 2.0 Test Sample must be linked to exactly one 
>>WCAG 2.0 technique or failure, unless a combination of techniques is 
>>required to meet a success criterion."
>>Best regards,
>>Christophe
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL
>>[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20060801/
>>Overview.html#navigation-mechanisms-mult-loc
>
>
Received on Monday, 30 October 2006 16:03:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:33 GMT