Re: updated "usage document", please review

Hi,

cstrobbe wrote:
 > I thought I had described how to name content files when you need more

I missed that.


>> Can you confirm that the reuse-versus-duplication issue wouldn't
>> also come up with the techniques approach?
> 
> I don't know for sure; at the moment I assume it is much less likely.
> Do we need to solve this now, or can we go ahead and solve the problem 
> if (when?) it occurs?

I think it will be difficult to rename the files at a later stage. It 
seems that there is no problem with the current naming for the metadata 
files, the problem only occurs with the content files. Correct?


Regards,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |

Received on Friday, 10 November 2006 07:25:20 UTC