W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > November 2006

Re: updated "usage document", please review

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 19:45:12 +0100
Message-ID: <45537738.1020103@w3.org>
To: cstrobbe <Christophe.Strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Cc: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Hi,

cstrobbe wrote:
> Referencing more than one test file from TCDL is not a problem (<file> 
> is repeatable).

Yes, but something like "sc1.1.1_l1_001.html" is not repeatable. Are 
there cases in which more than one content file (of the same technology, 
I don't mean auxiliary resources) is required?


> The reuse-versus-duplication issue raised by Vangelis is something 
> else. In this original mail [1] he proposed to use a naming convention 
> based on IDs of techniques instead of SC numbers. That could work, but 
> it would work better if we used the "Techniques for WCAG 2.0" as 
> "rules" instead of the success criteria - something that Shadi 
> suggested earlier.

Can you confirm that the reuse-versus-duplication issue wouldn't also 
come up with the techniques approach?


> [1] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Sep/
> 0043.html


Cheers,
   Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe |
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG |
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ |
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ |
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ |
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ |
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France |
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 |
Received on Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:45:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:34 GMT