W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org > July 2006

Re: teleconference on We 26 July, 2006

From: Christophe Strobbe <christophe.strobbe@esat.kuleuven.be>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 14:53:58 +0200
Message-Id: <>
To: public-wai-ert-tsdtf@w3.org

Dear All,

At 14:29 21/07/2006, Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote:
>1. Introduction of participants
>2. Working procedure for development of test samples

After a discussion with the WCAG WG chairs and team contact, it seemed best 
to start with sufficient and failure techniques for Level 1 in HTML. Then 
we could either move to another level (Level 2 in HTML) or to the next 
technology in Level 1, namely script.

The following guidance with regard to priorities was also came up:
1. Sufficient techniques are more important than advisory techniques. 
(Advisory techniques go beyond what is required to meet the success 
criterion but can be used to make some or all types of content more 
accessible. Many advisory techniques are currently just titles.)
2. Failure techniques are as important as sufficient techniques.
3. Level 1 is more important than Level 2 is more important than Level 3.
4. For TSDTD, technology-specific techniques are more important than 
general techniques.
5. For each technology, test cases for at least one sufficient technique 
per success criterion, and per situation if applicable, is needed (where 
techniques exist at all in that technology for that SC).
6. A complete set of tests for a given technology is more useful then 
partial sets for multiple technologies. The Task Force should choose what 
order to focus on but I would suggest first HTML, then Script, then CSS, 
then "other".

>3. Tools for storage of samples and test metadata

We don't only need this to track our own work but also when we present 
proposals to the WGs to decide on.



Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Departement of Electrical Engineering - Research Group on 
Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 - 3001 Leuven-Heverlee - BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51

Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
Received on Wednesday, 26 July 2006 12:54:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:05:59 UTC