W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-ert-tools@w3.org > January 2006

Re: proposal too add more criteria for searching tools list

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:19:19 +0100
Message-ID: <43C7D307.2040108@w3.org>
To: Carlos Iglesias <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
Cc: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@nils.org.au>, public-wai-ert-tools@w3.org

Hi,

Carlos Iglesias wrote:
>>Also, seems like "Classification" is a bit of a catch-all - 
>>is its purpose to recreate the categories we have in the current list?
> 
> 
> More or less, I find them useful and I think they should be recreated and expanded
> 
> E.g.
> 
> General- Tools that perform tests for a variety of accessibility issues.
> Focused - Tools that test for one or a limited aspect of accessibility.
> Services - Tools that run on an ongoing basis such as proxies, Web services, and monitors.
> Plugins/Extensions - Tools that run on other tools (need other tools to run)

In the past, classifying "General" vs "Focused" has proved to be challenging and not very beneficial. I agree with Andrew that the direction should be providing more granual options (as we have done by extending "Plugins/Extensions" to "Browser Integration", "Authoring Tool Integration", etc for example) rather than defining (ambiguous) blanket categories.

Regards,
  Shadi


-- 
Shadi Abou-Zahra     Web Accessibility Specialist for Europe | 
Chair & Staff Contact for the Evaluation and Repair Tools WG | 
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)           http://www.w3.org/ | 
Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI),   http://www.w3.org/WAI/ | 
WAI-TIES Project,                http://www.w3.org/WAI/TIES/ | 
Evaluation and Repair Tools WG,    http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/ | 
2004, Route des Lucioles - 06560,  Sophia-Antipolis - France | 
Voice: +33(0)4 92 38 50 64          Fax: +33(0)4 92 38 78 22 | 
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 16:19:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:18 GMT