W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org > July 2006

RE: "Process 101" requirements for your review and comment

From: Swan, Henny <Henny.Swan@rnib.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:55:19 +0100
Message-ID: <7DCC97516CAEE343BD17A00F900754E105C5F8C7@jstmsx01.ads.rnib.org.uk>
To: "Shawn Henry" <shawn@w3.org>, <public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org>

Hi All,

Looks ok to me although being a bit new I am still not fully clear what
"Process 101" is...

Under the question marks (??) is there mileage adding the question
"Should I be starting to use WCAG 2.0?". Discard this comment if this is
not what the "Process 101" is aiming to address.

Henny

-----Original Message-----
From: public-wai-eo-wcag2tf-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-wai-eo-wcag2tf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Henry
Sent: 07 July 2006 21:40
To: public-wai-eo-wcag2tf@w3.org
Subject: "Process 101" requirements for your review and comment


EOWG WCAG 2 Task Force folks,

Andrew and I have a draft requirements/analysis for the potential
"Process 101" (working title only) doc, available at:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process

Please comment on this list about:
* Does this cover what you think the doc should cover? What is missing?
* Do you disagree with any of it?
* Is the scope sufficiently defined?
* What do you think about the items with question marks (??)s ?
* Other thoughts...

Note that we're not meeting for almost 2 weeks so it's important to do
work via the mailing list in the meantime.

Thanks.
~ Shawn


-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 10:03:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 20 December 2010 18:16:52 GMT