Re: WCAG Intro for: WSTF Agenda for 12 July 2004

This is looking very good.  I like having the links to the documents towards
the top of the pile so that frequent visitors wouldn't have to sift through
a lot.

I still have concerns about people not understanding the difference between
1.0 and 2.0.  Also, I think more content is needed describing the difference
between, checkpoints, checklists, techniques, guidelines, etc.  I think the
Components page will take care of that - so maybe just repeat that link in
the WCAG Documents section?

Can we use the WCAG acronym more on this page?  A lot of the documents'
names are incredibly long.

Carol J. Smith
carol@kognitive.com

----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shawn Lawton Henry" <shawn@w3.org>
To: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 3:19 PM
Subject: WCAG Intro for: WSTF Agenda for 12 July 2004


>
> > - WCAG: Shawn might send something to list today
>
> initial, rough draft at:
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sketchpad/wcag-intro
>
> I did not look at Matt's UAAG and ATAG Intros before starting so as not
> to be biased (or lazy? :).
>
> ~ shawn
>
>

Received on Monday, 12 July 2004 17:24:53 UTC