W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-site@w3.org > April 2004

RE: clarification on RE: for EOWG - review Wednesday

From: <carol@kognitive.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 17:45:10 -0500
Message-ID: <407243A90000E0BC@mta9.wss.scd.yahoo.com>
To: "Shawn Lawton Henry" <shawn@w3.org>, michaeka@wellsfargo.com
Cc: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org

Same for me - I couldn't think of anything for the last point.

Carol
>-- Original Message --
>From: "Shawn Lawton Henry" <shawn@w3.org>
>To: <michaeka@wellsfargo.com>
>Cc: <public-wai-eo-site@w3.org>
>Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 14:05:10 -0500
>Subject: RE: clarification on RE: for EOWG - review Wednesday
>
>
>
>Blossom, Thank you very much for replying! ~ shawn
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: michaeka@wellsfargo.com [mailto:michaeka@wellsfargo.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 1:59 PM
>> To: shawn@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: clarification on RE: for EOWG - review Wednesday
>> 
>> 
>> Shawn - The issues you've written below are fine. B.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shawn Lawton Henry [mailto:shawn@w3.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 10:38 AM
>> To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org
>> Subject: clarification on RE: for EOWG - review Wednesday
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Note that what we need from you today is any changes or
>> additions to below as what I will send to EOWG mailing list 
>> tonight (or tomorrow) for discussion on Friday.
>> 
>> thanks
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org 
>> > [mailto:public-wai-eo-site-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Lawton
>
>> > Henry
>> > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:20 PM
>> > To: public-wai-eo-site@w3.org
>> > Subject: for EOWG - review Wednesday
>> > Importance: High
>> > 
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Below is my action item:
>> > - SHAWN, by Tue 27 April late: send draft highlights and Tim's quote
>
>> > info to WSTF list
>> > 
>> > Please comment TODAY per your action item:
>> > - ALL, by Wed 28 April: comment on stuff going to EOWG on
>> > Friday: purpose statement, Tim's quote, highlights ... so
>> > that I can meet my next action item:
>> > - SHAWN, by Thur 29 April: send stuff to EOWG list: purpose 
>> > statement, Tim's quote, highlights
>> > 
>> > :-)
>> > ===
>> > 
>> > Issue: Highlights on WAI home page
>> > 
>> > WSTF is considering having highlights on the WAI home page.
>> > 
>> > Purpose:
>> > - provide a space to address "hot" topics
>> > - provide a way to showcase different resources, since many people

>> > don't know what we have
>> > - make the home page more "alive" with timely topics that
>> > change frequently
>> > 
>> > Examples of things that might go in highlights area:
>> > - blurb on newly finished documents, such as standards harmonization
>> > - XYZ government adopted WCAG, with a link to Policies
>> > - technique addressing hot issue
>> > - tip from a document, such as Evaluating Web Sites for 
>> > Accessibility, with a link to that document
>> > 
>> > Notes:
>> > - would probably often have two highlights: 1. that stays longer and
>
>> > is a current high priority issue, such as standards harmonization,

>> > and 2, that changes more frequently, perhaps every week, such as a

>> > technique or tip
>> > - would not replace news/announcements as is currently on home page
>> > 
>> > ===
>> > 
>> > Issue: Quote on WAI home page
>> > 
>> > The current WAI home page (http://www.w3.org/WAI/) has in a 
>> > prominent position this quote: "The power of the Web is in its 
>> > universality. Access by everyone regardless of disability is an 
>> > essential aspect." -- Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director and inventor of

>> > the World Wide Web
>> > 
>> > Question: On the new WAI home page, should this quote be: a. above

>> > the fold, b. below the fold, c. not on home page (on another page,

>> > such as Introduction to Web Accessibility or
>> About WAI).
>> > 
>> > Discussion: @@ ... doesn't say what WAI is about or what the site is
>
>> > about... was important when WAI started to give credibility & that's
>
>> > not as important now... takes up fair amount of space and doesn't 
>> > give a whole lot of "umph" if you don't know who he is & many 
>> > don't...  [sorry, i'm too exhausted to do this now :-[
>> > 
>> 
>
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2004 18:47:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:18:19 GMT