- From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:54:45 +0200
- To: Wilco Fiers <wfiers@bartimeus.nl>
- CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Thank you Wilco. Best, Shadi Wilco Fiers wrote: > Thanks Tom. I've fixed the HTML issues and changed the buttons to anchor > elements. Also they're added to the bottom of the table now. I'm > personally not a fan of anchors outside an inline context but this seems > to be a majority view so that's fine. > > http://fiers.name/badtf/report/report.htm > http://fiers.name/badtf/report.rar > > Regards > > Wilco > >>>> "Thomas Jewett" <jewett@csulb.edu> 24-09-09 21:05 >>> > One possible visual confusion with buttons is that focus > remains on the last used one (e.g., Expand all rows) after > it's been clicked. So yes, links would be better (above > and below). > > I really like the icon for techniques and the bulleted > failure/tech lists minus the border. Clean! > > Please don't forget "PercEIvable" :-) > > Cheers, > > Tom > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 08:44:15 +0200 > Michael Stenitzer <stenitzer@wienfluss.net> wrote: >> hi, >> >> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >>> First, the table does not validate (I think pretty >>> simple stuff): >>> - >>> > <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Ffiers.name%2Fbadtf%2Freport%2Freport.htm&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&group=0> > >>> >>> >>> Also, I'm wondering if it is better (both visually and >>> functionally) to >>> have the "Expand all" and "Collapse all" as links rather >>> the buttons? >>> Would it make more sense to have these below the table >>> or floating on >>> the right? >> my vote is for links. >> place those above or both above and below. (it might be >> a long list when expanded) >> >>> Others, please comment on these design aspects. >> done >> >> cheers, michael >> >> >>> Best, >>> Shadi >>> >>> >>> Shadi Abou-Zahra wrote: >>>> Thanks Wilco, I'm working it into the Demo... >>>> >>>> >>>> Wilco Fiers wrote: >>>>> Hi Shadi, >>>>> >>>>> I've uploaded the archive file to: >>>>> http://fiers.name/badtf/report.rar >>>>> >>>>> Don't seem to be able to get around this filter we've >>>>> got on the >>>>> webmail. Hope this will do. >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Wilco >>>>> >>>>>>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 16-09-09 18:06 >>> >>>>> Hi Wilco, >>>>> >>>>> Ref: <http://www.w3.org/2009/09/16-badtf-minutes#item01> >>>>> >>>>> Thank you again for this brilliant work, everyone is >>>>> really happy >>>>> with how this report has come along. >>>>> >>>>> A few minor improvements have been suggested on today's >>>>> call: >>>>> >>>>> #1. highlight the principles level more clearly, >>>>> possibly by using a >>>>> background color to make that level stand out more >>>>> >>>>> #2. rename the title "Sufficient Techniques" to just >>>>> "Techniques" (so >>>>> that it either reads "Techniques" or "Failures") >>>>> >>>>> #3. add an icon to "Techniques", to complement the >>>>> "Failures" icon >>>>> (the comment was "either both should have icons or >>>>> neither") >>>>> >>>>> #4. check the spacing about "Techniques" and "Failures", >>>>> it seems to >>>>> be different (but may be fixed through the icons) >>>>> >>>>> #5. all techniques and failures listed in the respective >>>>> description >>>>> fields should be bulleted (currently on the failures >>>>> have bullets) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would be great to wrap these few issues up this week. >>>>> Please send the >>>>> entire HTML, CSS and JavaScript files in an attachment. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you, >>>>> Shadi >>>>> >> -- >> Michael Stenitzer | WIENFLUSS >> information.design.solutions KG >> t: +43 (650) 9358770 | proschkogasse 1/5 | 1060 wien >> f: +43 (1) 23680199 | www.wienfluss.net >> > > > > -- Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ | WAI International Program Office Activity Lead | W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 25 September 2009 06:55:24 UTC