W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org > May 2009

Re: pages to analyze

From: Thomas Jewett <jewett@csulb.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:46:56 -0700
To: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Cc: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Message-ID: <web-24721107@remus.csulb.edu>
Agreed -- this gets it rolling -- template
analysis to follow (it's pretty short). Thanks.

Tom

On Fri, 22 May 2009 11:08:13 +0200
  Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> Thomas Jewett wrote:
>> Hi, Shadi/all --
>> 
>> Trying to think of a reasonably efficient way to 
>>document
>> what will have to be a line-by-line analysis of the 
>>code.
>> I could simply add comments to a copy where they apply,
>> for example:
>> 
>> <!-- SC1.3.1, G115, G140, H42 -->     <h1>
> 
> It will be difficult to extract this information from 
>the HTML. I'd prefer that you do the opposite: copy the 
>code line into your report. For instance:
> 
> # SC 1.3.1
>  - H42: <h1>some text</h1>
>  - H42: <h2>another text</h2>
>  - G115: ...
> 
> 
>> Which brings up some questions:
>> 
>> - Should I do this for every occurrence, e.g., all <h2>s 
>>etc.?
> 
> Yes, please. I know it is a lot of work but necessary to 
>be sure.
> 
> 
>> - Should the comment be on the same line as the 
>>occurrence
>>   or before it? (I'm worried about connecting the report 
>>to
>>   the final line numbers in the code.)
> 
> As above, copy the code rather than the line numbers.
> 
> 
>> - Are just the SC/G/H numbers sufficient for this pass, 
>>or
>>   should I try to include all of the associated text and 
>>links
>>   here?
> 
> The numbers are sufficient, I'll search and replace the 
>text and links.
> 
> 
>> - And most importantly, is this strategy useable for 
>>doing the
>>   annotations and formatting the actual report?
> 
> Don't think so. Please disregard the annotations for 
>now. Once we have the complete report we can then select 
>specific ones for annotations.
> 
> 
>> Thanks for any ideas,
> 
> Thanks for working on this! Please pass along a first 
>iteration of the report (the template page only for now) 
>rather than waiting until the end to get feedback.
> 
> Best,
>   Shadi
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 20 May 2009 18:29:36 +0200
>>  Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> As discussed, please start a WCAG 2.0 conformance 
>>>analysis of the 
>>> following pages:
>>>  - 
>>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/template/>
>>>  - 
>>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/home/>
>>>  - 
>>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/news/>
>>>  - 
>>><http://www.w3.org/WAI/demos/bad/draft/2009/after/tickets/>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>   Shadi
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
>>>   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
>>>  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
>   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
>  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Friday, 22 May 2009 14:47:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 22 May 2009 14:47:47 GMT