W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org > May 2009

example report (was Re: Betr.: [Minutes] BAD TF teleconference on 13 May, 2009)

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:05:43 +0200
Message-ID: <4A1116D7.4090006@w3.org>
To: Wilco Fiers <wfiers@bartimeus.nl>
CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Hi Wilco, all,

Wilco Fiers wrote:
> Also as suggested here's an example of the kind of report Stichting
> Accessibility uses for it's reporting:
> http://www.accessibility.nl/voorbeeld/toets.htm
> Hopefully this will give you some new ideas Shadi.

Thank you for sharing this example. I think that there are two primary 
differences for the group to think about:
  - this report does not include handles for the requirements (eg "1.1" 
instead of "1.1 - Text Alternatives"). In WCAG 2.0 we have handles, do 
we want to include them when reporting?
  - this report is oriented towards inspection rather than to provide a 
full report. In other words, it only reports errors and only one error 
per requirement. We would need to provide more detail so that someone 
reading the report can learn where something went wrong (and why).

Looking forward to more discussion...


Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Monday, 18 May 2009 08:06:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:51 UTC