W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org > July 2009

Re: Betr.: [Minutes] Demo evalutaiton report

From: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:10:00 +0200
Message-ID: <4A5EE058.4050106@w3.org>
To: Wilco Fiers <wfiers@bartimeus.nl>
CC: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
Hi Wilco,

Conceptually this is looking very good, I only have some minor 
suggestions or rather questions:

#1. Colors - I don't completely understand the color-coding, it may be 
good to have a legend in this internal version for discussion. My guess 
is that we may try to reduce the use of colors in the final version to 
make it less complex to understand.

#2. Labels (aka Term) - would it be better to merge the number with the 
actual label into one table cell, like "1. Perceivable" rather than to 
have "1. | Perceivable"? Also, I personally dislike centered text but 
that is only a preference.

#3. Result - what does "Level A" or "Level AA" etc mean? Does it mean 
"passed Level A" or "failed Level A"? This may relate to point #1 on 
colors - we need to think about how many categories we are using and 
whether these can be reduced (maybe only "Passed", "Failed", "NA"?).

Thanks for working on this!


Wilco Fiers wrote:
> Hello all
> As suggested before I left for vacation I've worked on the final version
> of the evaluation table. I've spend a rather great deal of time figuring
> out what to report and how to present the information in such a way it
> would quickly make sence as well as present in-deth information and come
> up with the following:
> (Please look at it using firefox 3.5.)
> http://fiers.name/badtf/report.htm
> Right now it uses a few CSS rules many browsers don't support yet. This
> was done because it's an efficient way of writing it. This won't be used
> for the final version, but please only comment on the FF3.5 version.
> The empty image tags are going to get mechanismes to expand and/or
> collaps rows, and the different tables on this page represent various
> stages of expansion. This will all be scripted in later.
> I would very much appreciate feedback on the structure of the table (I
> know scope needs to be added). And at the visual presentation. I've used
> different colours for Failed, Level A,AA and AAA which I hope make it
> easy enough for users to at a glance figure out what's going on,
> regardless of the exact point in the table they are looking.
> If people agree to the design I can more onto building the complete
> table (accept for the evaluations) and creating it's script.
> Wilco
>>>> Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org> 08-07-09 19:55 >>>
> Dear BAD TF,
> The minutes from today's teleconference discussion is available:
>   - <http://www.w3.org/2009/07/08-badtf-minutes>
> Next meetings:
>   - Wednesday 29 July 17:00-18:00 CET
>   - Wednesday 2 September 17:00-18:00 CET
> Regards,
>    Shadi

Shadi Abou-Zahra - http://www.w3.org/People/shadi/ |
   WAI International Program Office Activity Lead   |
  W3C Evaluation & Repair Tools Working Group Chair |
Received on Thursday, 16 July 2009 08:10:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:51 UTC