W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Comments Batch #5 (Michael Stenitzer)

From: Eric Eggert <w3c@yatil.de>
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 23:40:17 +0200
Message-ID: <285a24310908291440t75de20f2y4cb87e7435f47079@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-wai-eo-badtf@w3.org
> #23) skipnav: increase the line-height slighly for better readability
Yes, we should do that

> #24) access-toggle: do not "abuse" the » for a visual element, consider a background image
We should do that, too

> #25) the hidden "copyright notice" label in the footer is kind of redundant information
Yes, this is redundant, probably change the wording.

> #26) accessible home page: while zooming (text only) the h2 needs a clear to the left
Yes. The text “Elsewhere on the Web” renders ugly without clearing

> #27) accessible home page: while zooming (text only) the tab-navigation gets disconnected from the demo-page below. this is due to the #mnav a, #mnav .current { ... height: 20px ...}
We should remove the height.

> #28) accessible home page - annotations: add the word technique (at least in the title-attribute) for every technique link, as it might not be clear for everybody that H37 is not a secret accessibility code ...

> #29) accessible home page - annotations: the html-elements and attributes are not consistently marked up within CODE-elements
Reject. The actual code for annotations will have consistent markup, I think.

> #30) accessible home page - annotations: why did you decide to clone the annotations instead of just temporarily changing the style to bring them in foreground?
Reject. Changing styles, getting blocks out of context may lead to
extreme confusion and jumps of the page. Temporarily cloning the text
is the save version. (Then again it is a matter of scripting styles.)

> #31) accessible survey: shouldn't we indicate the required fields in advance. the note which are required comes after submitting the form
We should add a text “required if not otherwise noticed”.

> #32) accessible survey: HTML-Error_option disabled="yes"
Should be changed to disabled="disabled" or disabled="" (or, as we use
HTML, even to disabled)

> #33) accessible survey: HTML-Error: even more errors after form processing
No (more) errors here.

> #34) accessible survey - after submission: style for the error summary needs a little enclosing, maybe a border around the whole error block
Don’t think so, it is apparent enough that those are the errors…

> #35) accessible survey - after submission: indicate the required fields with an asterisk in any case at the end of the label and with the visible wording "required" in red if the input was missing
Don’t think we need this, required fields are indicated w/ asterisk
and a red border.

> #36-#39) various table summaries
No. (the headings provide enough information, a summary would just
introduce redundancy. We should, however, add a notice that our tables
are not complicated enough to introduce summaries. I personally use it
virtually never.)

Regards, Eric

Eric Eggert

Waldfischbacher Straße 20, 66978 Leimen/Pfalz, Deutschland
Laudongasse 36/714, 1080 Wien, Österreich

http://yatil.de/ | http://snookerblog.de/
Received on Saturday, 29 August 2009 21:41:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:58:51 UTC