W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-wai-engage@w3.org > May 2012

Your input needed, please: can you answer just one question?

From: Sharron Rush <srush@knowbility.org>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2012 08:23:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CA++nJxqEs+DgDDXf-KAGtoGvGaK640a4G=Lj6S4eJJF65SvAtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-wai-engage@w3.org
Greetings all,

We at Knowbility have volunteered to help Denis reorganize the tables
within the *Accessibility Responsibility
Breakdown<http://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown>(ARB)
*project that he is contributing to the WAI-Engage wiki.  Denis has gotten
feedback to use the POUR principles as the organizing theme rather that the
conformance Levels. As we rebuild the tables, the question has arisen of
how much information to put in the sections.

Please compare the two tables:

Analysis<http://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown#Analysis>
http://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown#Analysis
and
Architecture<http://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown#Architecture>
http://www.w3.org/community/wai-engage/wiki/Accessibility_Responsibility_Breakdown#Architecture

Then answer the question of which presentation is preferable. Is it useful
to use the short descriptions of each guideline as a contextual reference
as in the Analysis table
-OR -
 or does it just add visual clutter and is it sufficient to link from the
number and allow context when users follow the link?

My opinion is that the tables will be very helpful and we would like to
make them as usable as possible, so you input is much appreciated. Thanks
for your ideas.

Best,
Sharron
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 13:23:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Sunday, 6 May 2012 13:23:42 GMT