RE: WAI-AGE TF teleconference - 28 July 2010

Hi all
Please can I use Zakim UK today - I have problems with Skype?
Secondly - in case I forget my links toolbar tells me that there are 164 links from http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sites-older-users/Overview.html. 

I can see that many of these are fundamental to the message within this page. However this is not the only example that I have noticed where the information pages are complex and I start going round in circles. 

Can I suggest that we have an editorial policy about whether a page is a navigational page (helping to lead you to the relevant information) or it is a target/content page (meaning 'stay here and read this'). In the second case I believe it would be helpful to focus on the message and strictly limit the number of links and cross references.
Any thoughts?
Suzette



-----Original Message-----
From: public-wai-age-request@w3.org [mailto:public-wai-age-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Arch
Sent: 27 July 2010 17:58
To: WAI-AGE Taskforce
Subject: WAI-AGE TF teleconference - 28 July 2010

Dear Task Force [1],

As per schedule [2], we meet again this Wednesday (30 June):
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#meetings
   - please send regrets to Andrew or the mailing list
Teleconference Bridge:
   +1.617.761.6200 (US); FR & UK numbers are problematic [3]
Teleconference code: 9243# (WAGE#)
IRC: Channel - #waiage; server - irc.w3.org; port - 6665

Scribe: Helle (Suzette / Darren - reserves)
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#scribes
Latest Minutes:
   http://www.w3.org/2010/06/02-waiage-minutes.html


*AGENDA*:

# *Welcome*
Note: the France and UK Zakim teleconference dial-in numbers are 
updated: +33.4.26.46.79.03 (FR); +44.203.318.0479 (UK) but limited to 
two concurrent callers at present - please use the US number 
(+1.617.761.6200) if possible.

# *Developing Accessible Websites for Older People*
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sites-older-users/Overview.html
  - being updated (refresh when reading)
  - Do the introductory sections meet the needs of the audience and 
describe the body of the document?
  - Do the descriptions and discussion under GL 1.1, 1.2 & 1.3 work 
without being too repetitive with "How to Meet"?
  - Consider the title (and the alternatives in the changelog)

# *Sample articles* for promoting WAI-AGE findings and materials
   Notes for requirements:
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/age-articles/articles-plan.html
   Managers: www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/age-articles/managers.html
   Developers: www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/age-articles/developers.html
   Users: www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/age-articles/users.html
  - initial feedback on readability and tone
  - suggestions for article titles

# *How People With Disabilities Use the Web*
   http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/PWD-Use-Web/2009/Overview.html
  - Update from Shadi

# *Next Teleconference* [2]
* 11 August 2010 (but may be rescheduled)
* EOWG open for TF participation <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/>

regards, Andrew
[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2008/wai-age-tf.html#participants
[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/2003/08/system-status



-- 
Andrew Arch
Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist
http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/

Received on Wednesday, 28 July 2010 09:56:33 UTC