- From: Andrew Arch <andrew@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 17:38:30 +0100
- To: WAI-AGE Taskforce <public-wai-age@w3.org>
Dear Task Force [1],
As per schedule [2], we meet again this Wednesday (19 May):
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#meetings
- please send regrets to Andrew or the mailing list
Teleconference Bridge:
+33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152 / +1.617.761.6200
Teleconference code: 9243# (WAGE#)
IRC: Channel - #waiage; server - irc.w3.org; port - 6665
Scribe: Helle (reserves Michael, Darren)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html#scribes
Latest Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2010/05/05-waiage-minutes.html
*AGENDA*:
# *Welcome*
# *Web Accessibility Training*
http://www.w3.org/WAI/training/
* see Shawn's call for review
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-age/2010AprJun/0007.html
# *Developing Accessible Websites for Older People*
* requirements:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-sites-older-users.html
- confirmation of Scope, Purpose, Audience, Approach
* main page (& possible Older Users entry/landing page)
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/sites-older-users/Overview.html
(http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/older-users)
- do we need all the discussion in 'Background'?
- do we need the discussion in 'Further Advice'?
- should this page just have technical advice?
- is there material missing from the page?
- how well does the layout of the Techniques listings work?
- any alternative suggestions for structuring/ordering the listings?
- should the official full wording from the Guidelines and/or the
Success Criteria be used?
- what ordering of Techniques might be appropriate?
# *next teleconference*
* Wednesday 2nd June 2010 [2]
regards, Andrew
[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2008/wai-age-tf.html#participants
[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wai-age/teleconf.html
--
Andrew Arch
Web Accessibility and Ageing Specialist
http://www.w3.org/People/Andrew/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/
Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 16:39:24 UTC