On 11/26/2019 12:33 PM, Michael Champion wrote: > > - Can Everteal create a plausible “living standard” option without > patent policy changes? > We currently envision changing the patent policy. > > - If not, what’s the W3M/AB plan to get a patent policy update in 6 > months? > We were told by PSIG to choose a major direction before they work on an update PP. At the AB last week we chose ET. Based on that Wendy feels that she can generate a proposed PP - modeled after our traditional PP needs as well as the work that PSIG did for EG in the sprint. We hope to get a draft by the end of January. > Does it seems feasible for the “living standard” aspects of Everteal > to reference an experimental patent policy but improvements to > facilitate well-maintained Recommendations reference the existing > patent policy? > I guess I would be interested in hearing PSIG's view on that question.
Received on Tuesday, 26 November 2019 20:40:26 UTC