- From: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:53:26 -0800
- To: "David (Standards) Singer" <singer@apple.com>
- Cc: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>, Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 10:54 AM David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote: > > > > > On Nov 15, 2018, at 9:41 , Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > > > > Since we are now past the deadline of 9am PST 2018-11-15, and the last > > email from Ralph shows lack of consensus, shall we extend the CFC, > > perhaps to Monday? > > I believe that Ralph is content with the suggested re-writes and has withdrawn his blocking of consensus. I don’t think the re-phrase affects anyone who previously gave consensus (and we have explicit confirmation from Nigel and the AB). I accept your assessment of non-affect on good faith. (plus Ralph and fantasai's follow-ups) > > Also I saw in GitHub that Ralph's comments are being addressed, and > > thus we should extend the CFC to make sure anyone not monitoring > > GitHub but may have already reviewed the process doc has a chance to > > review those diffs. > > We’re going now to AC informal review for a few weeks, and in order to hit a formal vote in time, I think we need to do that. Issues can still be raised (I hope minor) in informal review. > > Good enough? Yes, proposal to extend CFC withdrawn. Thanks for all of your attention to detail. I have been watching the issues discussed / patches iterated in GitHub as they've gone by. Lots of good improvements in this process revision. +1 (after the deadline but still :) Tantek
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2018 23:54:28 UTC