W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2018

Re: Process calls, and the way we work, and (no) meeting this week

From: Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2018 16:22:53 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4a1f9837-0bf7-4aef-6e7a-5b4f719e75c3@tink.uk>

On 18/12/2018 21:48, David Singer wrote:
>> On Dec 18, 2018, at 6:13 , Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:
>>> I agree, the focus on interesting and significant issues problem remains. But that’s almost the nature of standards work, as Chaals points out — people work on what they are motivated to work on. It’s hard to change that. We can’t *tell* people to do anything.
>> True. Is there any way to give the priority issues more oxygen in/on calls than non-priority issues perhaps?
> They are always the first things on the agenda; and sometimes we note that no progress has been made, and move on…
> we make sure that someone is assigned to them; we ask what the next steps are; what else can be done?
Probably not much else. I take it there were no constructive suggestions 
from the critics?

> David Singer
> Manager, Software Standards, Apple Inc.

@LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:23:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 19 December 2018 16:23:38 UTC