W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > September 2016

RE: Agenda: Process Document TF Telcon on Monday, 12 September, 2016

From: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 17:06:14 +0000
To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
CC: "public-w3process@w3.org" <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BY1PR02MB1114958BD291D64103717D84AEFA0@BY1PR02MB1114.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Yes, they can. I am working my way through the set of comments and it is taking longer than I hoped.

Steve Z

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Singer [mailto:singer@mac.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 9, 2016 12:05 AM
> To: Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
> Cc: public-w3process@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Agenda: Process Document TF Telcon on Monday, 12 September,
> 2016
> 
> Hi Steve, friends
> 
> I sent in some comments just before the deadline, can they be on the list of
> edits, please?
> 
> On TAG/AB vacated seats
> <https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/wiki/Advisory_Board_and_Tech

> nical_Architecture_Group_Vacated_Seats_Comment>:
> 
> Current text:
> 
> An Advisory Board or TAG participant's seat is vacated when either of the
> following occurs:
> 
> 	• the participant resigns, or
> 	• the Chair asks the participant to resign.
> 
> I think this is not right; the chair does not have the authority to remove
> someone at whim, do they? And even for the cases where resignation is forced
> because of the rules, the choice of who resigns is not made by the Chair.  So,
> actually, I think it’s more like:
> 
> An Advisory Board or TAG participant's seat is vacated when the participant
> resigns, either voluntarily or in order to satisfy the _participation
> requirements_.
> 
> 
> Also, this is very confused:
> 
> "When an Advisory Board or TAG participant changes affiliations, as long as
> Advisory Board and TAG participation constraints are respected, the individual
> may continue to participate until the next regularly scheduled election for that
> group. Otherwise, the seat is vacated."
> 
> a) AB has a hard ‘no two reps from the same member’, so it’s misleading for
> the AB (there is no way to respect the rule and continue to serve)
> b) for the TAG, they don’t have to *resign* immediately, but the seat *is*
> vacated immediately when they do, in fact, resign.
> 
> So, I think that this needs to be at most a note, and perhaps it should be
> deleted.
> 
> 
> > On Sep 9, 2016, at 8:09 , Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > The call is on Monday, 12 September, 2016 at 15:00-16:00 UTC
> >
> > Webex Information is on our Mail Archives internal-w3process@w3.org
> > (see separate e-mail to this list)
> > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/internal-w3process/2016Jun/0000.h

> > tml  (member only accessible)
> >
> > For residents of other (typical) time zones the start times were:
> > Pacific:  8:00
> > Eastern US: 11:00
> > Central Europe: 17:00
> > Japan: 24:00
> >
> > The purpose of these meetings has been to agree on the resolution of open
> issues, close them where possible or assign actions to move toward closure.
> >
> > Agenda:
> >
> > 1.      Review the draft Disposition of Comments on the August 3 Process
> Document.
> >
> https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/wiki/Draft_Process_2016_Comm

> ent
> > s
> > (in progress)
> > 2.      Any other topics
> >
> >
> >
> > Steve Zilles
> > Chair, W3C Process Document Task Force
> 
> Dave Singer
> 
> singer@mac.com

Received on Friday, 9 September 2016 17:06:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 9 September 2016 17:06:47 UTC