W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > May 2016

RE: Proposed W3C Process changes for MoU

From: Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 17:37:41 +0000
To: "timeless@gmail.com" <timeless@gmail.com>, David Singer <singer@mac.com>
CC: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Message-ID: <BN3PR03MB23242418A8089BBB6523412F97400@BN3PR03MB2324.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Is a "Memorandum of Understanding" essentially an agreement that somebody (Director? CEO?  Random person on the staff?) decides doesn't need a member review?

-----Original Message-----
From: timeless.bmo1@gmail.com [mailto:timeless.bmo1@gmail.com] On Behalf Of timeless
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:27 AM
To: David Singer <singer@mac.com>
Cc: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>; public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>; Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed W3C Process changes for MoU

On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:58 PM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote:
> In a formal definition, I would expect the term to be expanded:
>
> MoU: Memorandum of Understanding: …
>
> "something else that an MoU” -> "something other than an MoU”

agreed

Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 17:38:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 25 May 2016 17:38:12 UTC