- From: Michael Champion <Michael.Champion@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 17:37:41 +0000
- To: "timeless@gmail.com" <timeless@gmail.com>, David Singer <singer@mac.com>
- CC: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>, public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>, Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com>
Is a "Memorandum of Understanding" essentially an agreement that somebody (Director? CEO? Random person on the staff?) decides doesn't need a member review? -----Original Message----- From: timeless.bmo1@gmail.com [mailto:timeless.bmo1@gmail.com] On Behalf Of timeless Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:27 AM To: David Singer <singer@mac.com> Cc: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>; public-w3process <public-w3process@w3.org>; Stephen Zilles <szilles@adobe.com> Subject: Re: Proposed W3C Process changes for MoU On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:58 PM, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote: > In a formal definition, I would expect the term to be expanded: > > MoU: Memorandum of Understanding: … > > "something else that an MoU” -> "something other than an MoU” agreed
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 17:38:11 UTC