- From: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 17:59:43 +0100
- To: public-w3process@w3.org
On Mon, 09 May 2016 16:34:19 +0100, David Singer <singer@mac.com> wrote: > Oh, yes. Maybe we need to go back to deprecated? I don't think so. HTML 4.01 made HTML 4.0 obsolete. HTML 5 may have made HTML 4 obsolete. WALL/WURFL and the W3C Device Description work were among the factors that made CC/PP obsolete. None of which matters much in determining whether it is or is not obsolete. So I don't think there is an issue here. And I think "dbsolete" is clearer plainer english that "deprecated", which I only know of as a term amongst "spec-heads". cheers >> On May 7, 2016, at 18:50 , Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org> wrote: >> >> A simple question. >> >> Is there any conflict between the current discussion of obsoleting and >> the previous usage of the term in W3C. As one random example, HTML >> 4.01 in its Status says that it obsoletes HTML 4 [1]. >> >> Jeff >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html4/ >> >> > > Dave Singer > > singer@mac.com > > -- Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 16:03:13 UTC