W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > June 2016

RE: Followup to "Supergroups" message to AC Forum

From: Carr, Wayne <wayne.carr@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 18:15:22 +0000
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>, Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>, Carine Bournez <carine@w3.org>
CC: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
Message-ID: <52F8A45B68FD784E8E4FEE4DA9C6E52A9D9996E4@ORSMSX113.amr.corp.intel.com>


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel Glazman [mailto:daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, 21 June, 2016 07:58
>To: Jeff Jaffe <jeff@w3.org>; Florian Rivoal <florian@rivoal.net>; Carine
>Bournez <carine@w3.org>
>Cc: Revising W3C Process Community Group <public-w3process@w3.org>
>Subject: Re: Followup to "Supergroups" message to AC Forum
>
>On 21/06/2016 15:59, Jeff Jaffe wrote:
>
>> We can fix this easily.  We can (should?) put the names of the test
>> leads at the top of the documents.
>
>That won't make a difference. Tests will be browsed and monitored only by
>people in our industry, I mean implementors, while specs are read by
>zillions. Editors and contributors are already listed in the <head> of each
>and every test released.

I assumed Jeff meant the test lead's name is listed in the spec, along with the editors.

>
></Daniel>
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 18:19:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 21 June 2016 18:19:15 UTC