W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-w3process@w3.org > December 2016

Re: Requested addition to section 7.1

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 14:58:28 +0100
To: public-w3process@w3.org
Message-ID: <4f392235-f91c-6652-c188-e97654eaf3eb@disruptive-innovations.com>
On 27/12/2016 14:10, Jeff Jaffe wrote:

>> I therefore think that ISSUE-176 can be closed, at least for now.
> While I agree with your conclusion (that this may not need a change in
> process), I don't think we should close the issue without a thorough
> discussion in the Process CG.  Clearly there are those who feel that a
> process change is needed, and I think we need to hear them out.
> It would seem very odd to me if the way we respond to people who are
> saying: "you are making decisions without talking to me first" - is to
> close their issue without thoroughly hearing their proposals and
> discussing with them.

Thanks. And I am surprised to see a request to close issue 176 before
my change proposal is posted here.

Received on Tuesday, 27 December 2016 13:59:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 27 December 2016 13:59:01 UTC